Anglicans as Reformed

Many Anglicans say that Anglicanism is "reformed"  Christianity. That is an interesting description, and over the centuries, Anglicans with diverse views might accept it. Almost all Anglicans have been "reformed" in a general way. They have emphasized Scriptural authority, have accepted vernacular liturgy, and have had married clergy. They have also rejected papal infallibility and direct papal jurisdiction. Nevertheless, many Anglicans have acknowledged that they are reformed in some sense without being very clear about what being reformed means. 

So, how should contemporary Anglicans view being "reformed"? Anglicans need to understand being reformed in light of their heritage. Like most Anglicans since the Elizabethan settlement (roughly 1559-1571), contemporary Anglicans should acknowledge the value and the positive insights of the Reformation. While Anglicans value ancient catholic tradition, they reject Roman authority and emphasize Scriptural authority. And the Scriptural emphasis of historic Anglicanism has deep theological implications.

In a practical, sometimes fuzzy, Anglo-Saxon way, Anglicans acknowledge the Reformation "solas": sola Scriptura, sola gratia, and sola fide. Furthermore, Anglicans cannot honestly deny that Reformation figures such as Luther, Bullinger, Bucer, Calvin, and Melanchthon influenced the theology and practice of the Anglican Reformers and many Anglicans down through the last five centuries. The Books of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles are reformed documents. So being Reformed or Protestant is an inherent characteristic of Anglican belief and practice. No amount of high church or progressive revisionism changes the historical facts.