What about the Thirty-Nine Articles?

Since the sixteenth century, Anglican Christianity has often struggled with its identity. Certain characteristics have been obvious, such as its liturgical worship rooted in the Books of Common Prayer, a deep respect for Scripture, and the continuation of the ministry of bishops, presbyters/priests, and deacons. 

One disputed question has been the position of the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion. At first, the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion were intended to establish broad theological boundaries for the Elizabethan Church of England (1562, 1571). Many people have characterized the Articles as an attempt to be inclusive theologically, but they have often occasioned (and sometimes still cause) debate or dissension. Although the Thirty-Nine Articles are an inescapable fact of Anglican history and are still printed in most Books of Common Prayer, many professed Anglicans have debated their authority and their precise meaning. Some Anglicans and many non-Anglican observers have viewed them as a strict definition of Anglican doctrine; other Anglicans have ignored the Articles or have dismissed them as practically irrelevant. The original intent of the Crown, Parliament, and Convocation of clergy seems to have been more moderate than these extremes. They generally viewed the Articles as broad and comprehensive boundaries for English Christianity.

The Articles themselves reflect diverse influences- patristic Catholicism, Renaissance Christian Humanism, the Lutheran Reformation, the Swiss Reformation, and English ecclesiastical traditions. They exclude certain medieval and Counter-Reformation "Catholic" views, "Zwinglian" and Anabaptist sacramental views, and strict congregational or presbyterian ecclesiology. With these exclusions, they remain susceptible to varied interpretations. During the Elizabethan, Jacobean, and Caroline periods, the Articles were often interpreted from "Calvinist" and "Arminian" perspectives, but they were also open to other quietly held interpretations. 

In conclusion, neither Anglicans nor other Christians can ignore the historical fact that the Thirty-Nine Articles are associated with Anglican heritage and identity. The Articles express some basic Anglican theological tendencies. They emphasize the authority of Scripture, affirm core teachings of the ancient Christian faith and the Creeds, assert the value of the Sacraments, and support three orders of ministry. Nevertheless, the Articles are open to different interpretations on many issues. They are not a statement of systematic theology. They are neither strictly Lutheran, Calvinist, Tridentine, nor liberal. Their teachings are affirmations of some basic Christian principles from a moderate Reformation perspective.